Hi, If i am honest i think there would be significant advantages to just running the same OS on all the bits of hardware, NetBSD has a much wider hardware support base, Alpha, pmax and VAX.
http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/alpha/ http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/pmax/ http://wiki.netbsd.org/ports/vax/ Have a look to see if it supports the models you have. NetBSD also has pretty up to date GCC support,.. but lots of other compilers as well http://pkgsrc.se/lang I would use GCC 4.9 http://pkgsrc.se/lang/gcc49 https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/4.9.3/ Which for Fortran supports the old F77 and F95 standards as well as F2003 and F2008 https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.3/gfortran/GNU-Fortran-and-G77.html#GNU-Fortran-and-G77 https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.3/gfortran/Fortran-2003-and-2008-status.html#Fortran-2003-and-2008-status GCC like GEM is split frontend/middle/backend, so the C,C++,Fortran, etc compilers are quite separate from the targets. There are Alpha, MIPS and VAX backends, which i guess i implicit as thats what NetBSD uses to compile the OS. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.3/gcc/DEC-Alpha-Options.html#DEC-Alpha-Options https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.3/gcc/MIPS-Options.html#MIPS-Options https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.9.3/gcc/VAX-Options.html#VAX-Options regards --- Matthew J Fletcher
_______________________________________________ Simh mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
