> On Feb 20, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Will Senn <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Great answer and helpful. I'll give both approaches a shot. If I understand 
> my environment correctly, RT-11 is single user, single job (well, most of the 
> time anyway). So, it oughta be safe enough to try this without messing things 
> up beyond needing to restart if I have logic errors? That is, the file system 
> isn't involved or caching or anything that would cause inconsistency as a 
> result of an infinite loop or crash? Not that I would ever code such things 
> :)!

RT comes in several flavors, of which I know the SJ and FB 
(foreground/background) flavors, V2 specifically.  Both are unprotected 
operating systems, so you can play with I/O devices at will.

Also, in those there definitely is no caching in the file system.  For that 
matter, the file structure is simple enough that there really isn't anything to 
go "inconsistent".  A crash in mid-operation might cause a file not to be there 
if it was being written, but that's about it.  The only exception I can think 
of is the file system defrag operation, but then again that one may be written 
in a fault tolerant manner, I don't know.

        paul


_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh

Reply via email to