Oh, don't get me wrong. I don't mind the postings and the comments. I
just want to try and understand what you mean by them, and try to put
things into perspective, both from your side and mine.
We're about the same age. But I was actually exposed (through computer
clubs) to PDP-11 systems at an early age, for which we had no software,
so we had to start from scratch by writing some silly monitor on paper,
and put it in on the front panel, and eventually got to a point where it
could be saved to tape, so we could boot it, and do some very simple
things through that.
Of course, we also had core, so we had the software around in memory,
unless we accidentally corrupted memory as well.
I pretty much avoided the whole microcomputer revolution, since I
already had started playing with minis, and found them so much more
interesting and fun than micros... Having PDP-11s to play with both at
school and clubs, and eventually having my own PDP-8 systems at home in
the mid 80s, not to mention hanging out at University at night, when
"normal" students weren't around, to play on the PDP-10 systems there,
and connecting across the atlantic using IMPs, and god knows all the
weird stuff one was doing...
And most OSes back then were written in assembler. Unix was more of the
exception.
Johnny
On 2016-02-27 01:09, Eric Smith wrote:
Actually, on further reflection, I have nothing useful to add. Only
observations. I am probably much younger I am sure than most of you (not my
fault, and please don’t hate me for that). At 50 now I was in high school when
I did the Epson assembler.
I would probably do best to sit idly by and just enjoy threads like this one.
I truly do, too, since I’m interested in computer history (my first machine had
4K, and the assembler was my friend). I am SO impressed with what was done
with dozens of K core and early languages.
Having written device drivers and the like in assembly, I am impressed with the
notion of writing an entire OS .. that’s all. I just had to say something
about how impressed I was.
Now, I’ll be quiet and enjoy these threads! You guys are great .. please do go
on!!
On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:43 PM, Eric Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
Well .. impressive, I suppose, would be what I would call it.
I guess you'd start with hand-keying in an assembler .. then go from
there. I did that once in BASIC on a machine for which I could not
obtain an assembler (Epson HX-20).
It would be interesting to know how they went from B to C .. but once
they had a higher level language (C .. well, higher level compared to
the assembler), things would become much easier.
I was corresponding with DMR a couple of years before his passing. He
signed his C book for me. If he were still around it would be cool to
loop him in on this stuff and just ask.
On Feb 26, 2016, at 5:24 PM, Johnny Billquist <[email protected]> wrote:
On 2016-02-26 23:47, Eric Smith wrote:
I love assembly. I do. But seriously …
On Feb 25, 2016, at 9:26 PM, Gregg Levine <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Version Zero was hand coded on a PDP-7
I know Gregg is right. But .. Can you /imagine?/
Not sure I understand this comment either. Are you suggesting that coding an OS
is assembler is something exceptional or complicated, or unusual?
Johnny
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: [email protected] || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
--
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: [email protected] || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
