I have done some informal testing that showed clang to produce slower code than GCC for simh. The difference is perhaps within 5-10%, so not a lot slower, but enough to be easily measurable. It certainly is true, though, that compilation with clang is usually faster than with GCC.
-Henry On May 27, 2016 3:04 PM, "Kevin Handy" <[email protected]> wrote: > Has anyone done a comparison (benchmarks) between simh emulators compiled > with g++ verses clang? > > clang seems to me to run quite a bit faster than gcc, but I haven't run > any actual comparisons between the two so it is completely subjective. > > A full 'make' seems to build faster with clang than gcc. > > Just curious. I recently noticed bthe clang stuff in the makefile, so I > thought I'd try it out. > > > _______________________________________________ > Simh mailing list > [email protected] > http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh >
_______________________________________________ Simh mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
