> On May 21, 2017, at 10:54 AM, Tim Stark <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Interesting! Thanks for let us know about MP version of VAX-11/780. Will it
> be 787/789 emulation (VAX-11/785)? How about 784 (4 processors)? I recommend
> atomic variables for interlocking.
Instead of relying on exotic C features, it might make more sense to use
pthread primitives (mutex etc.) or semaphores. Those are likely to be more
generally supported.
paul
_______________________________________________
Simh mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
