Timothe Litt wrote: > Your code doesn't use the condition codes, so there's no difference between > your cmp and a TST (R3)+.
Thank you! Rhialto wrote: > OPR %R,(R)+ is listed as case 1. The difference between cases is > whether R is incremented before using it as the source operand. Yes, that's why PALX is complaining. > Both instructions affect all 4 flags, so no code can already depend on > preserving any. Thanks! I did this change, and alerted the original author. :-) _______________________________________________ Simh mailing list Simh@trailing-edge.com http://mailman.trailing-edge.com/mailman/listinfo/simh
