No problem.  Same thing here.  Let me know if you need anything.    I'm 
the middle of about a dozen projects and most of them involve Exhibit, 
Timeline, Timeplot, and/or Runway.  I can't seem to get any decent 
quality time with any one of them!

- John



David Huynh wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Thanks for the example! I'll try to get to it soon! Sorry, things have 
> been hectic on the official work front.
>
> David
>
> John Callahan wrote:
>   
>> Here is a sample Exhibit JSON feed I am using based on a publication 
>> database.  As of now, it has 41 records: 29 points, 9 polygons, 1 
>> line, 2 KML files (each KML file contains only 1 polygon.)
>>
>>
>> Dev Feed: http://dev.dgs.udel.edu/pubfeed-json
>> Dev Exhibit: http://dev.dgs.udel.edu/publications
>>
>> The field name containing the coordinates and KML links is: 
>> field_maploc_value
>>
>>
>> **Please Note**  This is a site very much in development.  It's 
>> usually restricted but I just opened it up for testing, temporarily. 
>>
>>
>> Each record only contains one value.  Meaning, each record represents 
>> only a single point, polygon, line, or KML file.  So, more information 
>> would be needed if Exhibit supported multiple values per record  (how 
>> would you tell a series of points vs a single line?)  (The KML files 
>> may contain multiple locations and multiple geometries but that's 
>> another story!)
>>
>> - John
>> **************************************************
>> John Callahan
>> Geospatial Application Developer
>> Delaware Geological Survey, University of Delaware
>> 227 Academy St, Newark DE 19716-7501
>> Tel: (302) 831-3584  
>> Email: [email protected]
>> http://www.dgs.udel.edu
>> **************************************************
>>
>>
>> Marko wrote:
>>     
>>> Hey John,
>>>
>>> Do you have an example already?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Marko
>>>
>>> On Mar 30, 5:35 am, John Callahan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Sure.  I'll put something together in the next couple of days.  It will
>>>> probably be based on example #1 (publication exhibit) from my last
>>>> email.  I have more control over the data sources in that one.
>>>>
>>>> - John
>>>>
>>>> **************************************************
>>>> John Callahan
>>>> Geospatial Application Developer
>>>> Delaware Geological Survey, University of Delaware
>>>> 227 Academy St, Newark DE 19716-7501
>>>> Tel: (302) 831-3584  Email: [email protected]http://www.dgs.udel.edu
>>>> **************************************************
>>>>
>>>> David Huynh wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> John,
>>>>>       
>>>>> Let's work together on this. I do want to unify all of the features into
>>>>> a single map view, but I need data to make a compelling and realistic
>>>>> example to test, and to show off the features. Could you please provide
>>>>> me with data for such an example?
>>>>>     - backgroundKMLsources (including points, polylines, and polygons
>>>>> that make up background landmarks)
>>>>>     - points, polylines, polygons that are items that can be filtered
>>>>>     - properties on those items useful for filtering
>>>>> In other words, if you can provide me with an exhibit, HTML and data,
>>>>> the way you want it, I'll try to make it work for real.
>>>>>       
>>>>> David
>>>>>       
>>>>> John Callahan wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Yes, this is what I am meaning.  In many cases, I do not want to
>>>>>> filter within theKML.  TheKMLfile can be treated in the same way as
>>>>>> a lat/long coordinate pair or polygon bounding box for a single item.  
>>>>>> In other words, as just another attribute.  Here are two projects I am
>>>>>> working on right now to illustrate the point.  I will use these to
>>>>>> write up something on the new wiki.
>>>>>>         
>>>>>> #1) I'm using Exhibit as a publication database (and of course,
>>>>>> browse/display tool.)  Each publication has many attributes, including
>>>>>> title, year, author, keywords, location, etc....  For the location
>>>>>> field, some pubs cover a single point (like a well), others cover a
>>>>>> series of points, others cover a region (like a populated town or a
>>>>>> coastal wetland.)  
>>>>>>         
>>>>>> #2) I'm building a site concerning environmental research on our coast
>>>>>> lines.  I like using Exhibit to browse/filter through the site
>>>>>> content. Some pages talk about hurricanes (lines, paths) that caused
>>>>>> significant damage.  Some pages focus on data collection stations
>>>>>> (points) with time series measurements (like temperature, stream flow;
>>>>>> a possibility here for Timeplot... )    Some pages focus on coastal
>>>>>> engineering projects that can be all sorts of locations/geometries.
>>>>>>         
>>>>>> For both projects,KMLworks great for the storage of geometry,
>>>>>> especially for display with Google Maps.  Much easier that dealing
>>>>>> with numerous coordinates. It's also much easier for me to update a
>>>>>> singleKMLfile then editing a full data array.  And with data coming
>>>>>> from multiple users, uploading aKMLfile nearly always works better
>>>>>> then entering coordinate pairs (for lines, polygons, or multiple points.)
>>>>>>         
>>>>>> - John
>>>>>>         
>>>>>> **************************************************
>>>>>> John Callahan
>>>>>> Geospatial Application Developer
>>>>>> Delaware Geological Survey, University of Delaware
>>>>>> 227 Academy St, Newark DE 19716-7501
>>>>>> Tel: (302) 831-3584  
>>>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>>>>> http://www.dgs.udel.edu
>>>>>> **************************************************
>>>>>>         
>>>>>> David Huynh wrote:
>>>>>>         
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> John Callahan wrote:
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> Instead of going through Babel to supportKMLfiles in Exhibit (which
>>>>>>>> essentially viewsKMLas a distinct data source and container of items),
>>>>>>>> I'd like to look at it from another perspective.
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> Why can't we supportKMLsimply as a field in the items[] array of an
>>>>>>>> existing data source?  The same with GeoRSS for that matter.  How about
>>>>>>>> something simple, like
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> ex:kml= field_name_with_link_to_kml
>>>>>>>> ex:georss = field_name_with_link_to_georss
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> Google Maps supportsKMLand GeoRSS natively using the GGeoXml()  
>>>>>>>> function.  Take a look at these two examples:
>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/examples/geoxml-rss.html
>>>>>>>> http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/examples/geoxml-kml.html
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> To me, this is identical to adding points (GMarker), lines (GPolyline)
>>>>>>>> and polygons (Gpolygon.)  Ideally, you would like to have any/all of
>>>>>>>> them displayed on a map at the same time.  That could even be a geotype
>>>>>>>> or geometery facet..."show me all items that are polygon based" or 
>>>>>>>> "show
>>>>>>>> me all georss feeds."
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> I knowKMLcan be a monster.  It's really a beautiful format as it can
>>>>>>>> support raw geometry (2d and 3d), cartographic information, and remote
>>>>>>>> data sources.  The full GeoRSS GML spec also gets complicated.  
>>>>>>>> However,
>>>>>>>> I believe supporting simple features only inKML/GeoRSS can go a long 
>>>>>>>> way.
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> Are there any obvious problems to supporting geo in this way?  I do not
>>>>>>>> know the Exhibit code so this method may not even be possible.
>>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> Loading wholeKMLsources onto the map can be supported, but then
>>>>>>> Exhibit cannot filter individual markers, polylines, and polygons added
>>>>>>> by theKMLsources. This is because the data must be homogenized into
>>>>>>> Exhibit's database in order for Exhibit's filtering mechanism to process
>>>>>>> it. (We can still support filtering by whole sources.) Is this what you
>>>>>>> want?
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>> David
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>               
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>   
>>>       
>
>
> >
>   

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SIMILE Widgets" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/simile-widgets?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to