Along the same lines, I notice that recovery.org still isn't living up to 
its stated principles: "Recovery.gov respects the intellectual property of 
others". They've removed the copyright notice from timeline, and so far as 
I can tell, have provided no attribution or acknowledgment anywhere.

I sent a polite note to them a long time ago which, of course, was never 
answered.

Jon


On Wed, 20 May 2009, rasmack wrote:

>
> I just stumbled upon a history project in Denmark using timeline:
>
> http://www.danmarkshistorien.dk/tidslinje/
>
> I noted that they had removed the copyright notice on the timeline.
> While I admire the purpose of the web page I think this is bad form.
> The question is if it formally violates the license under which they
> use the code.
>
> If anyone has feed-back on this, I'd be happy to incorporate it in an
> angry letter in my native tongue.
>
> Cheers,
> /Rasmus :-)


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SIMILE Widgets" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/simile-widgets?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to