I don't completely follow what you need; that would be easier if we
could see the whole example exhibit instead of the json fragment. Are
you trying to keep the json small or keep the exhibit output small?
On 7/26/2010 5:02 AM, Harald Groven wrote:
In an Exhibit, I have a JSON data source where 90% of the items have
nearly identical attributes. To save space, remove redundancy and make
it easier maintainable, the items are group together with a COUNT
field.
JSON-fragment example. Instead of...
{label : "foobar"},
{label : "foobar"},
{label : "foobar"},
{label : "foobar"},
{label : "bar"},
{label : "bar"}
...the items are grouped together as...
{label : "foobar", numberOfItems: 4 },
{label : "bar", numberOfItems: 2 }
But this creates a problem for the facet count, which will display
foobar 1
bar 1
Is it possible to use the SUM of the numberOfItems-field as facet
count instead of counting the number of JSON objects? So that the
facet count will look like
foobar 4
bar 2
--
Harald Groven
Web developer
Norwegian Center for ICT in Education
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIMILE
Widgets" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/simile-widgets?hl=en.
