Did someone managed to get rid of the "Stop running this script" alert in 
IE.

Here is a suggestion:
http://www.picnet.com.au/blogs/Guido/post/2010/03/04/How-to-prevent-Stop-running-this-script-message-in-browsers.aspx
 


I searched alot but unfortunately I dont know where this changes need to be 
implemented.

Thanks

On Monday, February 27, 2012 2:24:41 PM UTC+1, Janick wrote:
>
> I see your point, thanks for the reply! 
>
> The amount of records is giving us problems that's why we thought to 
> group and paginate. 
> People are getting the warning "Stop running this script?" in IE, I 
> have read this can be solved by changing a setting in IE but for us 
> this would not be a solution. 
> Other solution would be to insert a timeout when the loop is made, 
> unfortunately we are not able to find where to place this. 
>
> Maybe another way, is it possible to not show any records in the start 
> of the page and when someone selects a facets the json will be 
> filtered? 
>
> On Feb 25, 2:07 am, Ryan Lee <ryan...@zepheira.com> wrote: 
> > On 2012-02-23 07:15 , Janick wrote: 
> > 
> > > Hi All, 
> > 
> > > Is it possible to have pagination and items being grouped? 
> > > For me it's only one of the two, but not both. 
> > 
> > > Thanks! 
> > 
> > It isn't implemented to allow both, no.  There are a couple ways that 
> > come to mind to address problems with having both, but as-is it would be 
> > confusing - do you show the group heading if the grouping is split 
> > between pages on both (or more) pages, or not (it wouldn't now)?  You 
> > probably should, but that could make it hard to comprehend.  Do you show 
> > the total count on both?  Again, should, but that would also muddle 
> > things.  The biggest issue would be not being able to see the aggregate 
> > grouping across all of the selected data, which is part of what the 
> > grouping feature is for. 
> > 
> > I imagine retooling the grouping implementation to recognize paging and 
> > display a sensible split-page header (e.g., "Group 1 (21 through 40 of 
> > 55) on this page)" and show across split pages would make this more 
> > feasible. 
> > 
> > (Long answer in case someone feels like breaking out their hacker hat.)


On Monday, February 27, 2012 2:24:41 PM UTC+1, Janick wrote:
>
> I see your point, thanks for the reply! 
>
> The amount of records is giving us problems that's why we thought to 
> group and paginate. 
> People are getting the warning "Stop running this script?" in IE, I 
> have read this can be solved by changing a setting in IE but for us 
> this would not be a solution. 
> Other solution would be to insert a timeout when the loop is made, 
> unfortunately we are not able to find where to place this. 
>
> Maybe another way, is it possible to not show any records in the start 
> of the page and when someone selects a facets the json will be 
> filtered? 
>
> On Feb 25, 2:07 am, Ryan Lee <ryan...@zepheira.com> wrote: 
> > On 2012-02-23 07:15 , Janick wrote: 
> > 
> > > Hi All, 
> > 
> > > Is it possible to have pagination and items being grouped? 
> > > For me it's only one of the two, but not both. 
> > 
> > > Thanks! 
> > 
> > It isn't implemented to allow both, no.  There are a couple ways that 
> > come to mind to address problems with having both, but as-is it would be 
> > confusing - do you show the group heading if the grouping is split 
> > between pages on both (or more) pages, or not (it wouldn't now)?  You 
> > probably should, but that could make it hard to comprehend.  Do you show 
> > the total count on both?  Again, should, but that would also muddle 
> > things.  The biggest issue would be not being able to see the aggregate 
> > grouping across all of the selected data, which is part of what the 
> > grouping feature is for. 
> > 
> > I imagine retooling the grouping implementation to recognize paging and 
> > display a sensible split-page header (e.g., "Group 1 (21 through 40 of 
> > 55) on this page)" and show across split pages would make this more 
> > feasible. 
> > 
> > (Long answer in case someone feels like breaking out their hacker hat.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SIMILE Widgets" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/simile-widgets/-/XG-pin-0IxwJ.
To post to this group, send email to simile-widgets@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
simile-widgets+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/simile-widgets?hl=en.

Reply via email to