On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Tim Peiffer wrote: > I am in a position where I have redundant NMS operations, redundant DNS > servers, redundant ... well you get the picture.. Anyway, in order to > have redundant log and event handlers, I would either need to accept > dual actions, or look for a way of building in master/slave, > active/active or active/passive members. This brings me to the point. > I am getting twice as many notification actions as I need and I am > interested in cutting down further and still have redundant operations. > Is there a 'best practice' involving redundant SEC hosts, and > signalling between them? Does anyone have of a working model that I > could use?
take a look at the linux-ha project, it will let you do the master/slave (or larger clusters). you can have it move the IP that recieves the logs and start/stop SEC, so only one box will be active at a time. David Lang ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Simple-evcorr-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users
