In message
<eddf5556138a864f836192f6d101812a110c6...@fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.c
om>, "Boyles, Gary P" writes:
>Question on "lcall"...
>
>Is "lcall" a keyword for the action statement only (i.e. one of the
>action->list keywords)?
Yes.
>I tried to use it with pattern, and it doesn't seem to recognize it there.
To call perl from a pattern, I think you have to use a *perlfunc ptype.
Now that said, I believe:
if a rule run on startup does an:
eval %f { sub fooble {do something;} }
I think the later use of:
type = ...
ptype = perlfunc
pattern = sub ( &fooble (arg1, arg2) )
or some modification of that should work as all the user supplied
functions are compiled into the same namespace IIRC.
Somebody who has done more work with the SEC/perl interface will no
doubt have a better idea, or be able to prove I am talking
foolishness.
--
-- rouilj
John Rouillard
===========================================================================
My employers don't acknowledge my existence much less my opinions.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business. Deploy New Relic APM
Deploy New Relic app performance management and know exactly
what is happening inside your Ruby, Python, PHP, Java, and .NET app
Try New Relic at no cost today and get our sweet Data Nerd shirt too!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Simple-evcorr-users mailing list
Simple-evcorr-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users
