On 9/23/2013 11:46 AM, Risto Vaarandi wrote:
> hi Mark,
> maybe I am wrong here, but can't the quoting problem be handled with the
> lcall action?
> For example, lcall %o $+{Message} -> ( sub { ... } )
> would pass $+{Message} as a string into a precompiled function where it can
> be retrieved
> from $_[0]. Of course, using eval %o ( $+{Message} ) would indeed introduce a
> quoting
> problem, since $+{Message} would be substituted into an uncompiled code.
> I agree of course that accessing $+{Message} from varmap is fastest, because
> $+{Message}
> does not need substitution into the function parameter list.
>
That at least provides a path -- I wasn't sure if lcall would also interpolate
the value.
If it does not, this is just fine for me!
Thanks,
Mark
--
Mark D. Nagel, CCIE #3177 <mna...@willingminds.com>
Principal Consultant, Willing Minds LLC (http://www.willingminds.com)
cell: 949-279-5817, desk: 714-495-4001, fax: 714-646-8277
** For faster support response time, please
** email supp...@willingminds.com or call 714-495-4000
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Simple-evcorr-users mailing list
Simple-evcorr-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/simple-evcorr-users
