At 6:55 PM +0100 4/27/01, Colin Sidwell imposed structure on a
stream of electrons, yielding:
>Can anyone tell me how the following message got through the SIMS server?
>
>The log entry shows a message from NULL@NULL
>
>The message header follows, I have verify return paths checked.
>
>Thanks
>
>Colin Sidwell
>
>
>
>Return-Path: <>
>Received: from [212.74.142.84] (HELO lussi-jonathan) by
>smtp.idealinternet.co.uk (Stalker SMTP Server 1.8b8) with SMTP id
>S.0000004031 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:35:13
>+0100
A null return path is valid. It is the *required* return path for
server-generated messages such as bounces and delivery status
notifications (aka return receipts) so it is never right to bounce
mesages just because they have a null return path.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Geek seeks work! For details see: http://scconsult.com/bill/resume.html
#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
