It is rumored that on or about 2002-04-30 6:16 PM +0100, Ron Hahn wrote as follows: >OK, so is there another way to accomplish this? What I would like to do is: > >A) at the top of the rule file have all the routing for good addresses >B) at the bottom of the rule file have explicit rejects for bad addresses > >Is this possible or am I misunderstanding the documentation? > >Rgds, > >Ron
Ron Why you are trying to do is accomplished by default. If the only entry in your routing table was: <james> = james-abc then mail addressed to <james> would be routed to james-abc, any other addresses "fall out the bottom". If they don't match account names then SIMS rejects them with a "no such account" message. The suggestion Bill Cole made serves a slightly different purpose because he is routing to spamtrap. That rejects all the emails where any of the TO, CC or BCC addresses are routed to spamtrap, *even if some are valid!!* -- Neil Neil Herber, RGD Corporate info at http://www.eton.ca/ Eton Systems, 15 Pinepoint Drive, Nepean, ON, Canada K2H 6B1 Tel: (613) 829-4668 ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
