Bob Bergey wrote: >I think you created the problem, not Macjordomo <G>. It's not smart, >IMHO, to make up non-existent addresses when subscribing to a list.
Yes, it is smart, in order to being able to block mails to a certain mail address once you find out that it has been compromised and is now used by spammers. Besides, I have seen mailing lists that show me my address. So, it's just a missing "feature" that I think I should be able to have. Computers, after all, are supposed to serve human, not vice versa, as you seem to suggest :-) >Understand a little about the way they work Yes, I know why this is the case. Still, adding such a feature even to a cheap list server, where the server does sent each mail individually instead of sending them in a bulk, is just a few more lines to program. There is, for instance, MaxBulkMailer, a tool that did not have this feature originally. When I asked the author to include it, it was for him a deal of an hour or so to implement it. (I am a pro developer myself, so I know this stuff). And what do I care if it makes it slow? I run a small community here, and performance is of little concern. Again: This is my decision to make, not the software's. I've now sent a mail to the author. Perhaps he's allowing me to "fix" this :-) Thomas ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
