On Sun, 10 Nov 2002 16:10:40 -0500, The Count of CipherSpace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is alleged to have written: > > >Warren Michelsen at 2002-11-10 12:38 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>At 11:51 AM -0500 11/10/2002, The Count of CipherSpace wrote: >>> >>>The only way would be to have an entry for ALL accounts, then route >>>non-existing ones to a particular mailbox; something like: >>> >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = dom1-ac1 >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = dom1-ac2 >>>... >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> = dom1-acN >>> >>><*@domain1.com> = dom1-NoCigar >> >>Aha! Good idea. There are only about a dozen active accounts for the >>domain that is under attack. > >I should have mentioned this before. Instead of accepting the messages, >you could do one of the following: > ><*@domain1.com> = spamtrap ><*@domain1.com> = error ><*@domain1.com> = null > >the last one will just silently discard the message. > But he would actually want to route it to error, right? So the harvester would not think it a valid email address?
Or would it be better to route it to spamtrap? Would this do any good, since it would only work for this domain, anyway? ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
