<snip> (Today, for instance, it blocked 5029; cbl.abuseat.org
blocked 3224-- thanks, Bill Cole, for introducing that list to us;
sbl.spamhaus.org hit 3002; dialups.visi.com hit 121; and opm.blitzed.org hit
14.) <snip>
I like to at least read what the RBL has to say about its listing criteria and how things can be delisted before I add it to my RBL list. So when I go to cbl.abuseat.org I see that they specifically don't describe their listing criteria.
Anyone know what the philosophy of that person/group is? How safe from collateral damage would I be if I used it?
Thanks.
############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
