I have been doing something similar to what you're doing Bill.

I've been analyzing the spam traffic that arrives on my local servers and where I locate that the originating server's IP looks like it belongs to a block assigned to dial-ups, DSL, cable or similar patterns, I blacklist an entire block proactively.

So far, I've encountered one false-positive due to a typo by me. It was reported by a tech-savvy friend so I fixed that one.

I'm curious at what amount of false-positives you have been receiving? Do people contact you when they receive the blacklist error? Or does mail get lost when a false-positive is encountered?

Any experiences you can share?

Thanks!

-
nghai

On Dec 15, 2003, at 10:04 PM, Bill Cole wrote:

At 4:11 PM -0500 12/15/03, Clement Ross imposed structure on a stream of electrons, yielding:
Hello Bill,

Now I know how it feels to be blacklisted as you are blocking
205.205/16 (Worldcom CA) which is the parent of my 205.205.87/24. That's
obviously why I'm contacting you through the list.

Hole punched. As it says somewhere on the website, I will punch a hole on any evidence that it will let legitimate mail through and not let spam in.


Anyway.

I just consolidated the 24/8 address space to free some much needed
space in my SIMS blacklist. I noted that you do the same in your Solid
Clues Blacklist.

Would you mind sharing the exceptions that you are whitelisting in that
block?

None. If I were exempting anyone, you'd see a breakup like the one I have for 12/8.


This is a demo of why I have the big scary warning atop http://www.scconsult.com/blacklist.shtml. That blacklist is based on local experience. I have a unique local experience. The fact that 4/8, 24/8, 38/8 and most of 12/8 are shunned here is not a recommendation for anyone else, but rather an expression of what I find useful for my idiosyncratic mail stream. Given that over 90% of what is offered to me is spam, I have found it useful to be proactive in my blocking. 3/4 of the places I reject on any given day based solely on my blacklist are in other blacklists I use within a week.


-- Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


________________________________________________________________________ _
Hai Ng
"Virtual Tools for the Real World"



############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Reply via email to