On 3/18/04 7:56 AM, David Muszynski at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wouldn't it be easier to add a 2nd ethernet card to the server and bind > that to your internal network to do the backups?
I'm trying to envision how that would work. While I do have a second Ethernet card for the server Mac (before NAT routers became cheap, I ran IPNetRouter on it), I thought under MacOS 9, only one Ethernet card could be active for a protocol unless you were running something like IPNetRouter. Alternatively, is there a way to configure the two Linksys NAT routers (the wireless one is the BEFW11S4, the other is the wired-only BEFSR41) so that they both feed the same lan? Obviously, each NAT client would go out to the Internet via the router configured as its default. It seems to me like it should work and yet I have my doubts. > On Mar 18, 2004, at 7:40 AM, Larry Stone wrote: > >> >> On further thing I've done is separate the clients from the server. Since my >> provider nicely provides two IP addresses in my service and I had the needed >> hardware to do it, the mail server now is on a separate address from >> everything else. So assuming this was something from the client side, that >> should minimize the damage to the server side of things. It will complicate >> making backups since I do network backups and the backup software won't work >> across different subnets so I'll have to occasionally shutdown the mail >> server and move the server to the client subnet. >> -- Larry Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stonejongleux.com/ ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
