If both the secondary and the primary are running the same spam protection, how much additional spam is likely to come through the secondary? As opposed to simply being shifted to the secondary, that is.
The argument against having a secondary MX is quite strong when the proposed machine is out of your control and/or has a less discriminating antispam policy. But otherwise, I'd be surprised if there were a lot of non-blacklisted spammers who forego spamming unless they can find a secondary. Are there? --Elliot Wilen ############################################################# This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to the mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Send administrative queries to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
