Hi all, the situation is still the same as the last years. I actually have no projects with avr and I could not spend time for the simulation at all. Compiling the sources is still very simple by using a simple Makefile. All the things around like autotools seems to be broken. Bill has dropped his activity as he wrote in his last mails.
I have running simulavr on my linux box at home without any problems. It could be that there is a need for some minor patches because of new warnings of actual gcc toolchain. But nothing which is really a technical problem. My local sources are compiling without warnings. Only code generated from swig are source of some warnings but also without effect in the tool itself. I have not checked in something since years and the old linux box is not running anymore. So it is possible that I have not actually access to the cvs. :-) But I will look for it and put there my last local sources if possible. I also will check in my Makefile. I will not start with configuring autotools. If someone wants to do that: Good luck :-) As in the past I will answer on all technical questions as I did the last years. But there where not many questions at all. :-) Maybe all using studio and are happy. So let me look for the access for cvs the next days and will be back as I have finished the last updates... If you got no answer next days... feel free to remember me! :-) Have a nice weekend! Klaus >> Joerg Wunsch and I are admins/developers of many of the open source >> AVR projects: avr-libc, avrdude, avarice, avr-gcc-list and avr-chat >> mailing lists, WinAVR, FreeBSD AVR toolchain port, etc. > >> I believe both of us would be willing to take over ownership. > > I've already got a lot of rights in the simulavr project group, it's > just that I'm not an admin. However, my contribution there was/is > restricted to keep the old simulavr running enough so the most blatant > bugs are eventually fixed. > > As I already wrote, I can't even convince simulavrxx to a full build > on my FreeBSD, so quite some amount of work would be needed to get its > build infrastructure up to the level other opensource projects are. I > don't have the time for that myself (if I had more time available, I'd > probably rather fill the void in AVR-GDB first Ted once left). > > So IMHO it will take at least one (further) active contributor to > regularly maintain the code base, including committing everything to > CVS. > _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
