As Weddington, Eric wrote: (Timeframe for the transition from old simulavr to simulavrxx.)
> I would bet you a good German beer that it would take less time than > that for the "legions" of old simulavr users to switch over. ;-) I wonder where you'd get the good German beer from over in Colorado. :) The big question mark is simply that you'll never know for sure in an opensource project about how many active users might actually be out there. I've sometimes be surprised by people approaching me in private mail, when it turned out they've been using a particular feature for years you'd never have guessed about, just because the feature has once been there. Just remember how many years we've been telling people that there was really no realistic reason for crying after the death of the old sbi and cbi macros... Stories like these make me a little cautious about dropping certain backwards compatibility when it were actually easy enough to maintain. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
