> -----Original Message----- > From: Joel Sherrill [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 3:56 PM > To: Weddington, Eric > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Version and doc fixes > > Do you want to add stub sections which compare other > AVR simulators to this one? > > X Comparison to Other AVR Simulators > > X.1 simulavr (C version) > > X.2 avrtest
Since these 2 will probably be dumped in the very near future, I don't see a reason for the comparison. Joel, I don't know if you're subscribed to the avr-gcc-list mailing list, but I posted a question on that list this morning about any potential backwards-compatibility with simulavr. I got 5 immediate rejections of simulavr (nobody could get it to work) and nobody (yet) cares about backwards-compatibility. > X.3 Avrora That might be an interesting comparison, but hopefully in the future we can be feature compatibile with avrora, minus the RF support. Overall, I don't see a great need now to do comparisons. I'd like to put this off as a future task. > > The down side to this is that it seems I need to change the > file name of doc/simulavrxx.texinfo to doc/simulavr.texinfo > so the filename of the pdf is simulavr.pdf. Do we really care > about keeping the CVS history for this file? If not, I could > just delete the one file, and add the new filename. > Personally I don't think it matters. There isn't any critical > history is there? It's just documentation, not code. Eric _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
