On Sat, 14 Mar 2009, Weddington, Eric wrote:
I'm pretty agnostic to the language issue. If more people prefer python over
Tcl, then by all means we should keep the python support, and plan on migrating
away from Tcl to python.
The key is that we need help in maintaining this area. I would prefer that in
this early stage we pick a single IF and stick with it. I don't want to support
everything under the sun that swig supports. Python seems to be more in favor
these days and I certainly have nothing against it.
Michael, Knut, can you help out in this area?
If desired, I'd be willing to try to support the python bindings.
Note:
I'm not very good with the simulator yet.
I've not done any interlanguage linking with python before.
So far, my greatest feats of interlanguage linking are
BAL/FORTRAN, C++/FORTRAN, and AVR-assembly/C.
That said, I rather like python and would
likely get around to python/C++ eventually.
Pardon me while I google swig.org.
--
Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
"Pessimist: The glass is half empty.
Optimist: The glass is half full.
Engineer: The glass is twice as big as it needs to be."
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
