As Weddington, Eric wrote: > > This seems like an error condition the user > > would care about. Shouldn't there also be > > a message on stderr?
> Seems reasonable to me, as doing that (accessing a non-existent > address or IO location) would be an error condition in the simulated > program. The user should be notified in an unambiguous way. OTOH, I think there's also a point for having an option where the simulator behaves as best as possible like real silicon, i.e. unknown opcodes are executed as a NOP rather than triggering an exception, and access to unknown storage yields unpredictable results. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
