> -----Original Message----- > From: > [email protected] > [mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongn > u.org] On Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 4:14 PM > To: 'Michael N . Moran'; Knut Schwichtenberg > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Uniform the code > > That said, adding a level of indirection will slow things down a bit.
>From a project management point of view: - Speed of the simulator is the first priority. Techniques should be used with speed of simulation in mind. Obviously, not at the cost of correctness - An overall goal is to be able to support all AVR devices. We should not have multiple ways to implement device support. I personally don't care what techniques are used, but there should be a level of consistency from device to device. There should not be a "free-for-all". We should work out an agreement on how device support should be done with these goals in mind. _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
