As Onno Kortmann wrote: > There appeared a new backup(?) at > rsync://cvs.sv.gnu.org/sources/backup-20090527/simulavr which seems > to be complete, just by the name of the directory. It also seems to > be complete when looking at the contents (I tried git-cvsimport on > it and it produced the same contents as my latest git-cvsimport > from the old, working repository - except for my patch which got > applied in CVS)
It looked very incomplete when I looked yesterday, but perhaps I've caught them in the middle of restoring that one from backup. Looking again right now, you're right, it looks fairly complete. Thanks for verifying it against your git copy. > Also, I think that adding two rsyncs of CVS repos is a bit > problematic, as files which should be in the Attic/ will be > 'restored'. Only in case something got cvs rm'ed between the two backups, which I didn't believe has happened here. Anyway, unless someone vetoes against it, I'd go ahead telling the savannah folks to use the 20090527 backup for restoring the repository. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
