[email protected] wrote:
On Thu Jul 9 22:55 , "[email protected]" sent:
The attached code should implement atmega88 and atmega168.
It hasn't been tested much.
It compiles and the result still passes make check .
The attached "patch" is obviously incomplete.
I've attached the missing files.
atmega668base.{cpp,h} are slightly edited copies
of the corresponding atmega48 files.
If we add these, a refactoring is probably in order.
Deriving the atmega48 from the same base as the
atmega88 and atmega168 would remove duplicate code
and allow all three to be improved simultaneously.
If I commit it, will your next path do the refactoring? :-D
IIRC assignment to a PIN register will not toggle any PORT
bits and the USART in master SPI mode is unimplemented.
I even left the erroneous copyrights alone.
The patch subsumes the three-in-one patch.
--
Michael Hennebry
[email protected]
"War is only a hobby."
---- Msg sent via CableONE.net MyMail - http://www.cableone.net
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
[email protected] On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
_______________________________________________
Simulavr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
