> -----Original Message----- > From: > [email protected] > [mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongn > u.org] On Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Fwd: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed > with thedeveloment on GIT repo? > > I had intended this to go to the list the first time. > > On Sat Sep 26 3:11 , ThomasK [email protected]> sent: > > >as Michael Hennebry asked too in his posting a few days > before: how to > >proceed with all the changes, which are made now on Onno's > GIT repo at > >github.com? > > I think the thing to do is to go from CVS to git > and make Onno's git repo the official repository. >
I don't understand the reasonsing for this. The purpose of Savannah, is to provide central project management, including a revision control system. I have no overwhelming objection to using git, but I would like to understand the reasoning why the current CVS repository is unacceptable, or why SVN is unacceptable that it requires that we use git. If the problem is getting patches into the official repository, then let's address the root of the problem, and not just jumping ship. If people need commit access, then let's see about getting that done. However, I want to make sure that whatever goes in the official repository is in line with the general direction of the project, and is tested enough. Personally, I do have a problem making the "official" repository offsite away from Savannah. Savannah exists outside out any one persons' personal repository. Eric Weddington _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
