> -----Original Message----- > From: > [email protected] > [mailto:simulavr-devel-bounces+eric.weddington=atmel....@nongn > u.org] On Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:25 PM > To: [email protected]; Joerg Wunsch > Subject: Re: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed > withthedeveloment on GIT repo? > > Changing from CVS certainly is not required. > My suggestion was based on the following premises: > There has been a lot of work done that for some reason > did not find its way into the Savannah repository. > Otto's git repository is the Savannah repository + the > additional work. > git and subversion are both better VCSs than CVS. > For those who are good at them, git is better than CVS and subversion. > For whatever reason, there has been discussion of changing the VCS. > > Were it just me, subversion might be best. > CVS has never brought me joy, git is still something I've > just read about, > and subversion is something I use at work.
Sure git >= subversion >= cvs. But CVS is usable as a VCS. It's only when you start moving things around that one runs into pain. > Clicking on "request for inclusion" brought up an "unknown > signer" message. > Firefox did not specify the signer. Ok. And... > Even with commit privileges, I probably wouldn't use them. > I find it way too easy to make a mess. I find that a silly argument. You use SVN at work. How is this project any different? _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
