As Onno Kortmann wrote: I'll leave most of the stuff to be commented by others, as I don't want to be too deeply involved into that day-to-day development work.
Just two things from my side: > If there is no problem in keeping CVS and git in parallel on > savannah, lets have CVS with the old code and the new code remove > and the git with the C++ version only. Yes, that's possible. Unfortunately, there's no knob to add some additional comment to the "Use CVS" page (under "Source Code"), so the only way to inform others who might be innocently browsing the CVS tree about the move to Git is to drop some explanation file into the CVS tree. (Next version number) > We use the code that makes up _CVS_ HEAD (but in git of course) and > call it the 'stable' branch and give it 1.0rc0. Only important bug > fixes will be put on top of that until everyone agrees for a > release. That would sound quite good to me, and hopefully also address some remarks made by Michael. -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list Simulavr-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
