As Thomas Klepp wrote: > > What exactly is unclear here (and for which device)? > > There are sometimes in some documents (for example mega164/324/644 > datasheet from 02/2009, page 260, table 20-6, timer/counter 0 compare > match ... which? This happens too for atmega16) mistakes.
You're right, for the ...4 devices, this is indeed a mistake (and should probably be reported to Atmel). For the original ATmega16, timer 0 only has a single compare/match channel so there is no uncertainty. I /guess/, for the ...4 devices, it's compare/match channel A, but this should probably be cross-checked on real hardware first. -- cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
