http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=4626

The Golden Age of Islam is a Myth
By Serge Trifkovic
FrontPageMagazine.com | November 15, 2002

Second in a series of excerpts adapted by Robert Locke from Dr. Serge
Trifkovic�s new book The Sword of the Prophet: A Politically Incorrect
Guide to Islam
* * *
The hatred of Western Civilization, and the corresponding urge to
glorify anything outside it, especially if it can be depicted as a
victim of the West, is a well-known phenomenon of the contemporary
liberal mind. One of the forms it has taken in recent years is the
attempt to artificially inflate the historic achievements of other
civilizations beyond what the facts support. The noble savage myth is a
commonplace; what is more complex is the myth that has been bandied
about concerning the supposed "golden age" of Islamic civilization
during what we know as the Middle Ages. 

The myth of an Islamic Golden Age is needed by Islam�s apologists to
save it from being damned by its present squalid condition; to prove, as
it were, that there is more to Islam than the terrorism of Bin Laden and
the decadence of the oil sheiks. It is, frankly, a confession that if
the world judges it by what it is today, it comes up rather short, being
a religion that has yet to produce a democratic or prosperous society,
or social and cultural forms admired by neutral foreign observers the
way anyone can admire American freedom, Japanese order, Israeli courage,
or Italian style.


Some liberal academics openly admit that they twist the Moslem past to
serve their present-day intellectual agendas. For example, some who
propound the myth of an Islamic golden age of tolerance admit that their
goal is,

"to recover for postmodernity that lost medieval Judeo-Islamic trading,
social and cultural world, its high point pre-1492 Moorish Spain, which
permitted and relished a plurality, a convivencia, of religions and
cultures, Christian, Jewish and Moslem; which prized an historic
internationality of space along with the valuing of particular cities;
which was inclusive and cosmopolitan, cosmopolitan here meaning an ease
with different cultures: still so rare and threatened a value in the new
millennium as in centuries past."

In other words, a fairy tale designed to create the illusion that
multiculturalism has valid historical precedents that prove it can work.

To be fair, the myth of the golden age of Islam does have a partially
valid starting point: there were times in the past when Moslem societies
attained higher levels of civilization and culture than they did at
other times. There have been times, that is, when some Moslem lands were
fit for a cultivated man to live in. Baghdad under Harun ar-Rashid (his
well-documented Christian-slaying and Jew-hating proclivities
notwithstanding), or Cordova very briefly under Abd ar-Rahman in the
tenth century, come to mind. These isolated episodes, neither long nor
typical, are endlessly invoked by Islam�s Western apologists and
admirers.

This "golden" period in question largely coincides with the second
dynasty of the Caliphate or Islamic Empire, that of the Abbasids, named
after Muhammad�s uncle Abbas, who succeeded the Umayyads and ascended to
the Caliphate in 750 AD. They moved the capital city to Baghdad,
absorbed much of the Syrian and Persian culture as well as Persian
methods of government, and ushered in the "golden age." 

This age was marked by, among other things, intellectual achievement. A
number of medieval thinkers and scientists living under Islamic rule, by
no means all of them "Moslems" either nominally or substantially, played
a useful role of transmitting Greek, Hindu, and other pre-Islamic fruits
of knowledge to Westerners. They contributed to making Aristotle known
in Christian Europe. But in doing this, they were but transmitting what
they themselves had received from non-Moslem sources.

Three speculative thinkers, notably the three Persians al-Kindi,
al-Farabi, and Avicenna, combined Aristotelianism and Neoplatonism with
other ideas introduced through Islam. Greatly influenced by Baghdad�s
Greek heritage in philosophy that survived the Arab invasion, and
especially the writings of Aristotle, Farabi adopted the view -- utterly
heretical from a Moslem viewpoint -- that reason is superior to
revelation. He saw religion as a symbolic rendering of truth, and, like
Plato, saw it as the duty of the philosopher to provide guidance to the
state. He engaged in rationalistic questioning of the authority of the
Koran and rejected predestination. He wrote more than 100 works, notably
The Ideas of the Citizens of the Virtuous City. But these unorthodox
works no more belong to Islam than Voltaire belongs to Christianity. He
was in Moslem culture but not of it, indeed opposed to its orthodox
core. He examples the pattern we see again and again: the best Moslems,
whether judged by intellectual or political achievement, are usually the
least Moslem.

The Moslem mainstream of this time, on the other hand, emphasized rigid
Koranic orthodoxy and deployed Greek philosophy and science solely to
buttress its authority. "They were rationalists in so far as they fell
back on Greek philosophy for their metaphysical and physical
explanations of phenomena; still, it was their aim to keep within the
limits of orthodox belief." But when the thinkers went too far in their
free inquiry into the secrets of nature, paying little attention to the
authority of the Koran, they aroused suspicion of the rulers both in
North Africa and Spain, as well as in the East. Persecution, exile, and
death were frequent punishments suffered by the philosophers of Islam
whose writings did not conform to the canon. 

On the other side of the Empire, in Spain, Averro�s exercised much
influence on both Jewish and Christian thinkers with his interpretations
of Aristotle. While mostly faithful to Aristotle�s method, he found the
Aristotelian "prime mover" in Allah, the universal First Cause. His
writings brought him into political disfavor and he was banished until
shortly before his death, while many of his works in logic and
metaphysics had been consigned to the flames. He left no school. 

>From Spain the Arabic philosophic literature was translated into Hebrew
and Latin, which contributed to the development of modern European
philosophy. In Egypt around the same time, Moses Maimonides (a Jew) and
Ibn Khaldun made their contribution. A Christian, Constantine "the
African," a native of Carthage, translated medical works from Arabic
into Latin, thus introducing Greek medicine to the West. His
translations of Hippocrates and Galen first gave the West a view of
Greek medicine as a whole. 

The "golden age" of Islamic art lasted from AD 750 to the mid-11th
century, when ceramics, glass, metalwork, textiles, illuminated
manuscripts, and woodwork flourished. Lustered glass became the greatest
Islamic contribution to ceramics. Manuscript illumination became an
important and greatly respected art, and miniature painting flourished
in Iran. Calligraphy, an essential aspect of written Arabic, developed
in manuscripts and architectural decoration. 

In the exact sciences the contribution of Al-Khwarzimi, mathematician
and astronomer, was considerable. Like Euclid, he wrote mathematical
books that collected and arranged the discoveries of earlier
mathematicians. His "Book of Integration and Equation" is a compilation
of rules for solving linear and quadratic equations, as well as problems
of geometry and proportion. Its translation into Latin in the 12th
century provided the link between the great Hindu mathematicians and
European scholars. A corruption of the book�s title resulted in the word
algebra; a corruption of the author�s own name resulted in the term
algorithm.

The problem with turning this list of intellectual achievements into a
convincing "Islamic" golden age is that whatever flourished, did so not
by reason of Islam but in spite of Islam. Moslems overran societies
(Persian, Greek, Egyptian, Byzantine, Syrian, Jewish) that possessed
intellectual sophistication in their own right and failed to completely
destroy their cultures. To give it the credit for what the remnants of
these cultures achieved is like crediting the Red Army for the survival
of Chopin in Warsaw in 1970! Islam per se never encouraged science, in
the sense of disinterested enquiry, because the only knowledge it
accepts is religious knowledge.

As Bernard Lewis explains in his book What Went Wrong? the Moslem Empire
inherited "the knowledge and skills of the ancient Middle east, of
Greece and of Persia, it added to them new and important innovations
from outside, such as the manufacture of paper from China and decimal
positional numbering from India." The decimal numbers were thus
transmitted to the West, where they are still mistakenly known as
"Arabic" numbers, honoring not their inventors but their transmitters.

Furthermore, the intellectual achievements of Islam�s "golden age" were
of limited value. There was a lot of speculation and very little
application, be it in technology or politics. At the present day, for
almost a thousand years even speculation has stopped, and the bounds of
what is considered orthodox Islam have frozen, except when they have
even contracted, as in the case of Wahabism. Those who try to push the
fundamentals of Moslem thought any further into the light of modernity
frequently pay for it with their lives. The fundamentalists who ruled
Afghanistan until recently and still rule in Iran hold up their supposed
golden age as a model for their people and as a justification for their
tyranny. Westerners should know better.

* * *
Serge Trifkovic received his PhD from the University of Southampton in
England and pursued postdoctoral research at the Hoover Institution at
Stanford. His past journalistic outlets have included the BBC World
Service, the Voice of America, CNN International, MSNBC, U.S. News &
World Report, The Washington Times, the Philadelphia Inquirer, The Times
of London, and the Cleveland Plain Dealer. He is foreign affairs editor
of Chronicles.. Robert Locke is Associate Editor of Front Page Magazine.



                                       Serbian News Network - SNN
                                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                        http://www.antic.org/

Reply via email to