|
TRANSCRIPTS
http://www.un.org/icty/transe54/transe54.htm Monday, 26 May
2003 [Open
session] (…) Ms. Uertz-Retzlaff
(of Prosecution): During the cross-examination, the accused challenged the
validity of your expertise as such given your working methods, and you yourself
actually addressed limitations, particularly the lack of knowledge of the
Serbian language and details of historical facts. You said in this regard that
this did not allow you to see all facets of that propaganda at work and that,
therefore, you could not reconstitute the entire scope of the propaganda. This
fact that you could not see all facets, would that work in favour of the accused
or would it be his disadvantage, your limitations? Mr. [Renaud] De la
Brosse (expert witness): I think that would be disadvantageous to
him. WHERE ON THIS PLANET A COURT WHICH GIVES A LEGAL VALUE TO SUCH A DIALOGUE COULD EXIST AND BE STILL CONSIDERED AS A COURT? AT THE HAGUE. IF YOU DON'T WANT THAT SUCH A SURROGATE DETERMINES THE DESTINY OF THE SERBIAN PEOPLE OR ANY PEOPLE AT ALL, JOIN THE JUNE 28 DEMONSTRATIONS AT THE HAGUE. READ MORE http://www.sloboda.org.yu/engleski/demonstration.htm
To join or help this struggle, visit:
http://www.sloboda.org.yu/ (Sloboda/Freedom association) http://www.icdsm.org/ (the international committee to defend Slobodan Milosevic) http://www.wpc-in.org/ (world peace council) http://www.free-slobo.de/ (German section of ICDSM) http://www.geocities.com/b_antinato/ (Balkan antiNATO center) http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/ (an independent web site) |
<<clip_image001.gif>>
