Induction, deduction, logic, inference, reasoning, and all the like are a
bunch of conflicting and overlapping terms and definitions trying to
describe two things, 1) empirical logic which is converging, and 2) rational
logic which is diverging. Both of which must sense, collect, question,
compile, and structure what is in essense 'symbols' to advance.
The whole Empiricism vs Rationalism argument, and many of the other ongoing
philosophical arguments, only exist because humanity has never come to
define what questions are, and how these are converted to knowledge. This
is also the key to AGI, not knowledge itself.
If you want to know how a machine builds knowledge, you first have to define
where it comes from, or how it is created.
Kind Regards,
Bruce LaDuke
Managing Director
Instant Innovation, LLC
Indianapolis, IN
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hyperadvance.com
_________________________________________________________________
The average US Credit Score is 675. The cost to see yours: $0 by Experian.
http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=660600&bcd=EMAILFOOTERAVERAGE
-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?list_id=11983
