On 5/30/07, Russell Wallace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(For what it's worth, I think Eliezer's a brilliantly eloquent philosopher, particularly in his writing about Bayesian epistemology. I also think his ideas on AI are castles in the air with no connection whatsoever to reality, and I've said as much on SL4.)
Could you provide some links to your critiques of Eliezer's ideas on AI? I tried a search for "Russell Wallace site:http://sl4.org/archive"; on Google, but this returned 1,350 results. Are there any other critiques I should be aware of? The only other one that I know of are Bill Hibbard's at http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/g/mi.html . I personally have not found much that I disagree with in Eliezer's writings. At the very least, he's the amongst the most sane of the people out there writing on AI. (Echoing Joshua Fox's request:) Ben, could you also tell us where you disagree with Eliezer? -Jey Kottalam ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&user_secret=7d7fb4d8
