On Jan 26, 2008 8:57 PM, Bryan Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 26 January 2008, Mike Tintner wrote: > > Why does discussion never (unless I've missed something - in which > > case apologies) focus on the more realistic future > > "threats"/possibilities - future artificial species as opposed to > > future computer simulations? > > This is bias in the community. The majority of the information from > SingInst, for example, focuses on digital ai and not the potential ai > that we can get from the bio sector, like through synbio and > gengineering and tissue engineering of neurons and brains. >
I guess limitation of biological substrate are too strict, and there is not much to hope for from this side. Maybe we'd be able to construct a genetically engineered scientist with huge brain that will develop AGI, before cracking this problem ourselves ;-) -- Vladimir Nesov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to: http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&id_secret=90259355-e04be3
