A good question [originally posted on semantic-web and public-lod lists].

Forwarding the conversation to Ontolog-Forum and SIOC-Dev lists as
their subscribers may also have interesting insights.

Simon Reinhardt wrote:

> Hi,
>
> It is becoming somewhat popular for large ontologies to be split into a core 
> ontology file and module ontology files (which import the core). Normally 
> each module then gets its own namespace for the terms defined in it. I was 
> wondering though if that is too complicated for users of the ontologies. I 
> have seen confusion of "sioc" and "sioct" (the prefixes for the SIOC core and 
> the SIOC Types module namespaces) and when such vocabularies get higher 
> adoption by people not so well versed with ontologies I can see it happen a 
> lot more often.
>
> So as an alternative I want to explore the idea of just using one namespace 
> shared between the core and the modules. The advantage would be not having to 
> guess which namespace to use. One disadvantage for the developer(s) of the 
> ontology is that a "local name" can only be used in one of the modules or 
> core, you can't use the same "word" under a different namespace with a 
> different meaning. Another disadvantage is that if you want the terms to 
> dereference to the ontology files they have been defined in then you can only 
> do that with a "/" namespace (and you have to set up lots of redirects).
>
> My questions: What do you think of that idea? Can you see any other 
> advantages or disadvantages? Do you think several namespaces are not 
> confusing at all? And what are the main advantages to splitting up ontologies 
> into modules other than being easier to organise? Do they justify a higher 
> burden on the ontology users?
>
> Thanks,
>  Simon
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SIOC-Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to