On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Olivier GENDRIN <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Alexandre Passant <[email protected]> wrote: >> sioc:sibling is currently defined with sioc:Item as both domain and range. >> I think that's a useful property to model sibling user accounts, e.g. >> creating a direct relation between a Twitter and FB account, w/o >> having to rely on a foaf:Person to link both. >> >> Any opinions? Could we remove the domain / range restrictions of >> sioc:sibling to allow such use-cases? > > Having read the definition, I’m not shure you can use sibling to link > a Twitter and a FaceBook account : that would suppose that the > contents of both are the same, wich is rarely the case.
Indeed - good point. So maybe edit the definition (I find the naming of sibling appropriate for this), or create a new property? Alex. > > -- > Olivier G. > http://identi.ca/lespacedunmatin > http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/blog/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "SIOC-Dev" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en. > -- Dr. Alexandre Passant - @terraces Founder, CEO - http://seevl.net - @seevl http://facebook.com/seevl.net - http://angel.co/seevl -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIOC-Dev" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en.
