Hi John, What's the status of the SIOC revision?
I see revision 1.35 (2010-03-25) at http://sioc-project.org/ontology and http://rdfs.org/sioc/spec/ -Jodi On 23 Jul 2012, at 09:09, John Breslin wrote: > I've added these to the list of updates for the next revision, probably in > August - > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xdoKtjx9g-izDJE4pHFnRy9pEjodgTmuZcvDlyQ7 > xY8/edit# > > John > > On 22/07/2012 14:10, "Jodi Schneider" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That would work as well... >> >> However, it looks like "discussion_of" might be the most consistent choice. >> Existing inverses, except temporal ones, use the pattern has_X/ X_of. >> >> Existing inverses: >> has_administrator administrator_of >> has_container container_of >> has_creator creator_of >> has_function function_of >> has_host host_of >> has_member member_of >> has_modifier modifier_of >> has_owner owner_of >> has_parent parent_of >> has_reply reply_of >> has_scope scope_of >> has_space space_of >> has_subscriber subscriber_of >> has_usergroup usergroup_of >> >> earlier_version later_version >> previous_by_date next_by_date >> previous_version next_version >> >> What do you say to "discussion_of"? >> >> -Jodi >> >> PS -- While we're at it -- I'm surprised that has_moderator doesn't have an >> inverse. Should we also add "moderator_of"? >> >> >> On 20 Jul 2012, at 12:33, Nathan wrote: >> >>> discusses? >>> >>> Jodi Schneider wrote: >>>> Maybe is_discussion_related_to would be better? >>>> To me, I would expect is_discussion_about to connect to topics (e.g. to >>>> have rdfs:range sioc:topic) -- which is not the intention here. >>>> What do other people think? >>>> -Jodi >>>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Olivier GENDRIN >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> 2012/7/20 Jodi Schneider <[email protected]>: >>>>>> I'd suggest this: >>>>>> sioc:is_discussion_of >>>>> is_discussion_of or is_discussion_about ? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Olivier G. >>>>> http://identi.ca/lespacedunmatin >>>>> http://www.lespacedunmatin.info/blog/ >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>>> "SIOC-Dev" group. >>>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>>>> [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit this group at >>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en. >>>>> >>>>> >>> > > -- > John Breslin http://johnbreslin.org http://linkd.in/johnbreslin > Lecturer, Electronic Engineering, NUI Galway http://www.eee.nuigalway.ie > Researcher, Social Software and Semantic Web, DERI http://www.deri.ie > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SIOC-Dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
