> -----Original Message-----
> From: rahul pande [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 7:18 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] Clarity required regarding timeouts...
> 
> 
> The section 10.3.1 in SIP RFC states ::
> 
> "A SIP client using an unreliable transport protocol SHOULD 
> retransmit a SIP 
> INVITE request with an interval that starts at T1 seconds, 
> and doubles after 
> each packet transmission. The client ceases retransmissions 
> if it receives a 
> provisional or definitive response, or once it has sent a 
> total of seven 
> request packets."
> 
> When a provisional response for an INVITE reaches the Client 
> , it will stop 
> having any timeouts, then there is a chance that the 
> application might hang 
> if the server is malacious and does not follow the standard. 
> Shouldn't the 
> RFC specify what is that timeout value as in the case of 
> section 10.2.1 for 
> other Requests other than INVITE.

No. This is implementation dependent. Its up to you how long you wait for
the phone to ring before giving up.

-Jonathan R.

---
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D.                72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist                             First Floor
dynamicsoft                                 East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                     FAX:   (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net                      PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to