> -----Original Message-----
> From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:10 PM
> To: Ranjit Avasarala
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Stateful vs Stateless vs something in
> between?
>
>
> Hi Ranjit:
>
> As I stated in my first message in this thread,
>
> ( Clearly, there are instances where proxies need to be
> > stateful to support certain kinds of funcitonality whereas
> > for things such
> > as re-transmission, I see these as being performance
> > enhancements in the
> > proxy. )
>
> Here I am specifically referring to re-transmission as a
> requirement for
> stateful proxies and I just wanted to know why this is a requirement.
You CANNOT do things like forking if you are stateless. Its not a
performance enhancement, its a functional requirement. Call forward
no-answer won't work either.
-Jonathan R.
---
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist First Floor
dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
