> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ranjit Avasarala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:44 PM
> To: Harpreet Ahluwalia
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] clarification regarding no ACK at UAS
>
>
> see my comments inline...
>
> Regards
> Ranjit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Harpreet Ahluwalia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:08 AM
> Subject: [Sip-implementors] clarification regarding no ACK at UAS
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Again refering to dreaft 03 of 2543...
>
> pg 102, from the "Figure 11: State transition diagram of server for
> INVITE method", it seems that if the UAS does not get an ACK after 7
> retransmissions of 200, it will consider the transaction as completed
> but invitation failed, so it will basically consider the call as not
> established. Am I correct?
>
> yes the call will be disconnected,
Right.
>
>
> If that is the case, will he destroy the call
> context immediately or wait for a bye, or send a bye, even
> though he did
> not get an ACK. I can't find anything in the text which says how to
> proceed in this case. Although the text is very clear for a similar
> scenario for the UAC, it does not say anything for the UAS when 7
> retransmissions of the 200 are done.
>
> ya the call context will be destroyed by sending a BYE.
Well, it makes sense for the UAS to send a BYE, but I don't think it says
that anywhere. I'll add that. Waiting for a BYE is mostly useless, since if
the ACK is the thing getting lost, the UAC has no way to know that the call
is disconnected.
-Jonathan R.
---
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Ave.
Chief Scientist First Floor
dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
