I very much welcome killing CR-only. My execution profiling experience tells that trying to understand all these options may account for up to 20% of CPU time in a stateless proxy (depending mainly on how many characters must be processed which mainly depends on how messages are built by their senders).
I have not sighted a non-CR-LF implementation, except debugging messages I send and create on Un*x (LF-only). (Which is not bad from server's parsing performance perspective ... I always seek LF and ignore optional CR.) -Jiri At 05:34 PM 10/5/2001, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: >Folks, > >My apologies for sending this to sip and sip-implementors, but maximal >coverage is needed here. > >The spec says that implementations MUST send CRLF to terminate lines, but >MUST interpret CR or LF by themselves as line terminators, for backwards >compatibility. We want to trim as much of this stuff as possible from the >spec. So, I ask: is there anyone out there who sends CR or LF alone as line >terminators? If so, speak up NOW! Otherwise, we will remove this reuqirement >from the spec and ONLY CRLF will be discussed. > >-Jonathan R. _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
