Jonathan Rosenberg wrote: > > Sarju Garg wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Normally all the common fields or mandatory ones in SIP message has > > a compact form with the exception for CSeq. Why? > > I think because it got added as a header much after the previous ones, > and somehow it didn't get a short form. > > > Can we have one > > for it also? > > No. Its not backwards compatible at all. >
It was also felt that CSeq is sufficiently short that it wasn't worth the hassle once we noticed that it had been omitted. -- Henning Schulzrinne http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~hgs _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
