Hi, I found some noncompliance between draft-rosenberg-mmusic-sdp-offer-answer-00.txt (refered to as "offer-answer") and draft-ietf-sip-service-examples-03.txt (refered to as "examples"), can someone help to explain?
1. In� "offer-answer" section 3.1, it is stated that "If a stream is offered as sendonly, the corresponding stream MUST be marked as recvonly in the answer." An example of noncompliance can be found in "examples" section 2.1, F10 & F12. 2. In "offer-answer" section 4, it is stated that "When issuing an offer that modifies the session, the o line of the new SDP MUST be identical to that in the previous SDP, except that the version in the origin field MUST increment from the previous SDP." An example of noncompliance can be found in "examples" section 2.1, F6 & F10. Thanks, Eileen � _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
