Jo Hornsby wrote: > Richard Aas wrote: > >>>>I'm implementing a SIP UAC (UDP unicast only) and have the >>>>following questions: >>>> >>>>PS. I'm using RFC 2543 as the standard (not the drafts). >>>> >>>> >>>Uh. Why? Suffice to say that that are are number of >>>not insignificant changes in State Of The Art that >>>fix a number of broken things in 2543. Plus, bis-05 >>>is ooodles easier to parse than any previous incarnations, >>>and would probably have immediately answered the >>>questions that you had. >>> >>To quote the IETF; "Internet drafts have no formal status >>and are subject to change or removal at any time. Under no >>circumstances should an Internet Draft be referenced by >>any paper, report, or request-for-proposal, nor should a >>vendor claim compliance with an Internet Draft." >> > > I understand the semantics of something being an > ID; however, this doesn't mean they shouldn't be > tracked. > > If you stick to pure 2543, I doubt that you will > do a Record-Route implementation that is truly > workable (this is egregious), you might choose > to incorporate a number of things that are now > deprecated (PGP; Hide; Via comments; > multiple-messages-per-datagram; to name but a > few), you will not be able to cope with Request > Merging scenarious, and the list goes on, > believe me. > > Such an approach seems ill-advised, and also I > am failing to see any good reason. If you > instead look at bis-05 (or later), you will > be largely largely largely fully 2543 compliant, > and also have a reasonable &:) shot at being > compliant to RFCxxxx when we move to Draft > Stadard. > > > - Jo. > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors >
Up to the point drafts are backward-compatible with RFC 2543, I agree with you. Thanks for good advice:) regards, Richard _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
