[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>It is a guideline, but not a MUST strength recommendation, for headers
>>to have the general form that uses comma as an element separator. You
>>should not be deeply parsing any headers for which you don't know
>>about, so I don't really see an issue.
>>
>
> My question about comma-seperators was also motivated from convenience
> of
> parsing: I wondered if it was legitimate to reuse generic code for
> counting
> and seperating the fields of an arbitrary header. I see now that this is
> not possible.
Of course its possible, but just not on headers you don't know about.
Headers are supposed to follow that general form in extensions (this is
called out in sip-guidelines). SO, if you had such code, you would find
it useful for new headers.
-Jonathan R.
--
Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 72 Eagle Rock Avenue
Chief Scientist First Floor
dynamicsoft East Hanover, NJ 07936
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: (973) 952-5050
http://www.jdrosen.net PH: (973) 952-5000
http://www.dynamicsoft.com
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
