And that behavior led to some serious problems. Notice that the 409 code is now not even defined in the bis draft. The use of (and reaction to) action= is completely deprecated. Nobody should be providing them, and if you see them, ignore them.
As I posted earlier, look at caller-prefs for a better solution. RjS On Wed, 2002-03-06 at 10:57, Chris Boulton wrote: Even in earlier drafts this was not allowed. For example bis 04 page 33(pdf) reads :- "All current registrations MUST share the same action value. Registrations that have a different action than current registrations for the same user MUST be rejected with status of 409 (Conflict)." HTH, Chris Boulton. >From: "Prakash GS" >To: >Subject: [Sip-implementors] Can a REGISTER have 2 contacts with actions as "proxy" and "redirect" ? >Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 16:43:36 +0530 > >hi all > I want to know if a REGISTER have 2 contacts with actions as "proxy" >and "redirect" . > Should the proxy send an error message to the User-Agent that has >sent the Register? > > OR > > If this can occur , what should a proxy-server do when it receives an >INVITE for the User-Agent in question? > Should it proxy or send a redirect response or does the "qvalue" come >into the picture ? > >Regards >Prakash > > >_______________________________________________ >Sip-implementors mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors ________________________________________________________________________ Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: Click Here _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
